Poppe Law Blog

view all


Law News

more

Law We Know

General

more

Testimonials

  • I would like to take this opportunity to write to your law firm and thank you for coming through for me when I lost hope in my previous attorney. 
  • We will gladly be a reference for you, and we certainly will recommend you as the attorney to have in Louisville.  You have a gift in the way you are able to communicate with your clients and within the legal system.

  • My father would have been so proud to know that his case was driven home with such passion and genius.  Thank you for giving that jury every tool they needed to hold those people accountable for the torture they inflicted on my Dad.


     

  • Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you...
  • You have now made it possible for me to rest assured that I have everything I need now and in the future to cover the expenses of my disability

more


print page

Blog Category:

General

11/17/2008
Hans G. Poppe
Comments (1)

Fen-Phen Lawyers Ordered to Repay Clients $42 Million

On Wednesday, Judge William Wehr ordered Shirley Cunningham, Jr., Melbourne Mills, Jr., and William Gallion to repay their clients $42 Million for breaching fiduciary duties owed to their clients by taking more money from the settlements than they were entitled to. You can read about the allegations here. This is different than a legal malpractice case, because they clients don't have to prove the lawyers were negligent. Instead, the clients have to prove the lawyers breached their fiduciary duties. Lawyers owe their clients the highest duty of trust. This means a lawyer cannot place his own interest (or anyone else's for that matter) above the interests of his client. Even if a lawyer achieves a good result for his client, if he violates his fiduciary duties, he may be held liable. That is exactly what happened in some breast implant litigation in Texas, and it is exactly what happened here in Kentucky. There is no argument that this was a substantial settlement achieved on behalf of the Fen-Phen plaintiffs against a major drug company; however, the lawyers took more money than they were entitled to. Now a judge has said they have to give it all back, plus interest and possibly punitive damages. Another interesting development is that Judge Wehr has also ordered Cincinnati lawyer Stan Chesley to be prepared to attend trial and defend himself against the same allegations. This is an interesting development becuase Chesley has denied he was involved in the misappropriation of client funds and was simply involved in negotiating the settlement with Wyeth Pharmacutical. Chesley is an extremely successful lawyer who has been involved in major cases in Kentucky and across the country. Judge Wehr has previously stayed the proceedings against Chesley but is expected to rule next week on whether to lift the stay. Lexington attorney Angela Ford represents the Fen-Phen clients against the lawyers and has dowloaded the pleadings and orders to her website. Hans Poppe

Labels:
Bookmark and Share


1 Comments to "Fen-Phen Lawyers Ordered to Repay Clients $42 Million"

Wow!
Posted by Tom Foster on August 5, 2007 at 12:04 PM

Post a comment

Post a Comment to "Fen-Phen Lawyers Ordered to Repay Clients $42 Million"

To reply to this message, enter your reply in the box labeled "Message", hit "Post Message."

Username:*

Password:*

Register for an account

Message:

Notify me of follow-up comments via email.

For security purposes, please enter the graphic text in the box below: [hit F5 if you can not read the text]

Personal Injury and Accident Attorney for Louisville, Jeffersontown, Elizabethtown, Radcliff, Lexington, Frankfort, Bardstown, Ft. Knox, Richmond, Covington, Bowling Green, Newport, Owensboro, Paducah, Pikeville, Ashland, Morehead, Murray, Jefferson, Bullitt, Shelby, Hardin, Meade, Spencer, Henry, Larue, and Fayette Kentucky as well as New Albany, Jeffersonville, Indianapolis, Clark, Floyd, Harrison, Jefferson, Scott, Washington, Crawford, Perry, Marion and Spencer in Indiana.

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.